Canadian proposal
With the bank collapse and revelations of 18 years of problematic government, Iceland is seriously considering a number of radical changes.
The wider context for this discussion is of course the looming, and ever growing, probability that Iceland will join the European Union. There are very good historic reasons for this too to make sense, since Iceland culturally has been part of Europe for almost a thousand years. But in another sense, Iceland is a very different type of country than other European countries: much less crowded, much less multicultural, much less industrial. Iceland will always be the northern fringe of Europe, a sign of the breadth of its embrace, and not the homogeneity of its members.
In other words, Canada fits Iceland's identity of itself maybe a bit better than the EU does. So why is there no serious discussion of the Canadian proposal here in Iceland? Well, certainly it doesn't seem to be a very well-thought-out proposal, it has just been casually bantered about in the newspapers. And Icelanders probably also realize that identities are subject to constant change.
But it is in fact the nature of the relationship that makes it out of the question; clearly Iceland would loose any semblance of being an independent nation if they become a province of Canada, and they have the clear example of Newfoundland to prove that point. On the other hand, the EU is offering Iceland to retain its nation status, and moreover to give a very small country the same power as much larger countries. Iceland gains authority by joining the EU, it does not loose it. And I have a feeling Icelanders like that idea better.
Comments