The term is really tricky, just simply put, kind of like holding a moon beam in your hand. My biggest problem though is understanding whether or not I am taking, or whether or not I am supposed to take, some sort of leadership role in advancing my understanding of the term. Whether I should forcefully advocate my view, or just go quietly about using it the way I use it.
Of course I am not a shy person generally speaking, but nor am I the type that feels everyone needs to agree with me or do what I say. And of course people generally speaking are very, very apt not to do what anyone else suggests they should do, and tend to want to do things their own way. They are, in other words, a lot like the shifty term Viking.
Here is the link to song from the Sound of Music.
4 comments:
So then,what IS your definition of Viking? Your opinion is certainly valid and mine is not fully formed. Help me out here.
Hi Jon! When my paper is done I will be posting it up at vikingaheimar.wordpress.com, but the short answer is that I use a very broad definition for Vikings, ie: the Scandinavian (Norse)-speaking peoples living between 750 and 1050 A.D. Not a revolutionary definition by any means, but one that has considerable scholarly resistance.
Hægara að fitja skýhnoðra upp á prjón...
I have it bookmarked. Thanks!
Post a Comment